Failure Time

Oct 2

this always makes me very happy


this always makes me very happy

(Source: mothersnewsofficial)


Really excited to let you know that this poster, featuring one of my favorite quotes from Hank, is now available at DFTBA Records! And it’s 20% off until September 1st!


Really excited to let you know that this poster, featuring one of my favorite quotes from Hank, is now available at DFTBA Records! And it’s 20% off until September 1st!

I am convinced that creativity is a priority to the integrity of the universe and that life is regenerative and conformity meaningless.

- Buckminster Fuller (via alteringminds)

(Source: liberatingreality)



Serves you fucking right you little bitch

Don’t be a dick, Thomas The Tank Engine.

(Source: funnuraba)

Jul 6

(Source: chynagrove)

Jul 6

(Source: pleatedjeans)

Hey what's your opinion on Bo Burnham, as a person and as a comedian?



i think bo burnham is a genius. there’s this perception surrounding him since he’s a musical comic and an offensive white dude that he’s a hack, but i would disagree. i wouldn’t put him in the same category as daniel tosh and dudes like that because when daniel tosh makes an offensive joke, it is because he thinks stereotypes are funny, but when bo burnham does it, it is always with the intention of breaking down the structure of comedy and examining why people think that’s funny, or at least to criticize audience members (and himself) for participating in the perpetuation of offensive stereotypes as humor.

there are times when he does it without the examination, but he makes it very clear in other parts of his act that his “traditional stand up” material is something that is being forced upon him by pressures to be mainstream or to maintain his “edgy” persona. the comedy bo is clearly more interested in is misdirected musical comedy and rapid worldplay. 

like all great artists, bo burnham exists at the nexus point between artistic depth and commercial appeal. his entire act (both Words Words Words and What) is at once an attempt to reconcile those contradicting influences and a criticism as to why he has to.

there’s a multitude of moments, songs, and bits i could cite to support this, but there are seriously so many i wouldn’t know where to start. you know, it might be a little bit of a stretch for me to say this, but bo is kind of like the beatles in the way that it’s difficult to remove one individual piece from a collection. just like you can’t comprehend the genius of the beatles unless you listen to one of the full albums, you can’t comprehend the genius of bo burnham unless you watch an entire set, and i would, again like the beatles, you should experience them in the order they were released for the full impact.

like, you’ll see what i’m talking about from the very beginnings of Words Words Words, when bo’s first joke is misogynistic one-liner, and he immediately goes into What’s Funny, a tour de force examination of why people laugh at the stuff they laugh at. 

i’ve already written way too much and i only talked about one thing, but there’s a ton i love about bo burnham. he’s one of my favorite artists, and i think him and allie brosh are two of the best artists our generation has offered up so far.





If bees become extinct we will have exactly 4 YEARS to live on this planet. I don’t understand how “not giving a fuck” is more important than your life…

okay, I have a thing to say about this. I’m no expert on bees, but I am a biologist (and entomologist) so I think there is something I can contribute that’ll be of worth.

I agree entirely with the sentiment that we must protect honeybees. Obviously they are massively important for biodiversity, as well as pollinating food crops for humans. There is no doubt that if all the honeybees in the world were to vanish in a day that the consequences would be dire.

However, I disagree that the main cause for concern regarding honeybee death is the use of Genetically Modified (GM) crops. I’d be very interested to read a research paper that says ‘GM crops have killed millions of honeybees’, if indeed such a paper exists because in all honesty I find it highly unlikely that this is a true statement.

Let’s start with some facts about GM crops:

1. The development of GM crops is a highly regulated process, bound by strict country-specific legislature. A great number of trials are carried out long before commercial planting of a GM crop is even considered. It is these trials, and accompanying laboratory studies, that ensure a GM crop is safe to non-target organisms (such as honeybees) by investigating direct and indirect effects (Nap et al. 2003).

2. Crops that are genetically modified to express insecticidal proteins (for crop pest control) have a high level of specificity. This means that the insecticidal proteins being produced by the GM plant will only affect a narrow range of insect groups because of the chemical properties of the protein. For example, GM crops expressing insecticidal proteins sourced from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) will only target some Lepidopteran pests (caterpillars; Romeis et al. 2006). Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis of the literature found that GM Bt crops do not negatively affect the survival of adult honeybees or their larvae (Duan et al. 2008).

3. GM crops can be tailored such that the novel gene is expressed only in particular parts of the plant. For example, GM Bt rice plants express the toxin in the stems but not the grains (Datta et al. 1998). This technique means that gene expression can be excluded from the flowers/pollen of the crop plant, so that bees and other pollinators would not be affected. Neat, huh?

So those are a token few reasons why GM crops are safer than perhaps many people believe (as the result of a lot of questionable, non-scientific articles). To come back to our main point about honeybee death, I would like to briefly mention a few alternative explanations for the recent decline in honeybee populations. These are as follows:

1. Many bees have died as the result of broad-spectrum insecticide use. These are pesticides that lack specificity, and can be harmful to non-target organisms. Neonicotinoids are a well-studied example of this (Decourtye & Devillers, 2010). Not to worry, though, because many broad-spectrum pesticides including neonics are well on their way out. Indeed, the EU recently banned a large cohort of neonic pesticides. This is still a topic of controversy, mind (Goulson, 2013).

2. Many bees have died as the result of Varroa mite infestation. Imagine you’ve been bitten by several ticks, except those ticks are the size of dinner plates. That gives you an idea of the severity of a Varroa mite infestation on a single developing bee. The parasitisation of bees by Varroa mites and other parasites is often accompanied by disease transmission. This can result in colonies dying within two years after infestation (Johnson, 2011).

3. Many bees have died as the result of ‘colony collapse disorder’.  This is a phrase that has popped up a lot recently, and is basically an umbrella term for the various causes of bee death including parasite infestation, disease transmission, environmental stresses, and management stresses such as poor nutrition (Johnson, 2011). Colony collapse has been attributed to broad-spectrum pesticide use in some instances. However, it is has still been observed in countries where broad-spectrum pesticides have been withdrawn (in the EU, like I mentioned earlier; Johnson, 2011).

So those are my main points. Please excuse the bullet-point nature of this; I was trying to keep it fairly short. Not sure I managed that haha. But anyway, my take-home message is that GM crops are not the enemy when it comes to honeybee decline. If anything, bees are at much greater danger from the use of broad-spectrum pesticides and from parasites and diseases. Using GM can even help to alleviate some of the problems associated with broad-spectrum pesticides, as they greatly reduce the need to apply such chemicals (Romeis et al. 2006).

A finishing note: Do your homework. Go on google scholar and read some of the literature, making sure it is recent (within the past 10-15 years). Literature reviews are a great way to find out what the consensus is on any given topic. Don’t use popular media as your main source of information where science is concerned; they tend to favour scandal and exaggeration. You want to know what’s really going on? Check out some research articles and see for yourself.

Thanks for sticking it through to the end of this impromptu mini-essay! —Alice


Datta, K., Vasquez, A., Tu, J., Torrizo, L., Alam, M. F., Oliva, N., Abrigo, E., Khush, G. S., & Datta, S. K. (1998). Constitutive and tissue-specific differential expression of the cryIA (b) gene in transgenic rice plants conferring resistance to rice insect pest. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 97(1-2), 20-30.

Decourtye, A., & Devillers, J. (2010). Ecotoxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides to bees. In Insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (pp. 85-95). Springer New York.

Duan, J. J., Marvier, M., Huesing, J., Dively, G., & Huang, Z. Y. (2008). A meta-analysis of effects of Bt crops on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). PLoS One, 3(1), e1415.

Goulson, D. (2013). Neonicotinoids and bees: What’s all the buzz?. Significance, 10(3), 6-11.

Johnson, R. (2011). Honey bee colony collapse disorder. DIANE Publishing.

Nap, J. P., Metz, P. L., Escaler, M., & Conner, A. J. (2003). The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. The Plant Journal, 33(1), 1-18.

Romeis, J., Meissle, M., & Bigler, F. (2006). Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nature biotechnology, 24(1), 63-71.

[First image shows grocery-store signs reminding shoppers that bee pollination is crucial for much of the fruit we eat. Second image asserts, without providing a citation or mechanism, that GM crops are killing honeybees.]

Bless those who cite peer-reviewed literature in their internet arguments. 

(Source: antinwo)

Jun 7

[IFF] Rape jokes

Jun 2

(Source: thashield)